[Ed. he appointed Justice Horace Gray. gray wrote the sick distorted and very legally wrong opinion in Wong Kim Ark... that chain of events had a drastic effect on our lives daily now that we have an ineligible President who was somewhat sanitized by that decision. Since Arthur was not eligible, his only SCOTUS appointment wrote the most BS opinion in SCOTUS history just to make his own right to be a Justice more sanitary. It reeks.]

I’d like some info to help me make better arguments with my friends that don’t understand that Obama is not eligible. Can someone please point out where it says that people with dual citizenship are not eligible? They keep claiming that as long as you were a citizen at birth then you’re a Natural Born Citizen. TYIA

If Obama is a “natural born” then every anchor baby in the United States is a “natural born”.

If all one had to do was be born on American soil, then we have a major problem.

Food for deranged thought: If it is found that Obama is not legitimate, the Supreme Court MUST overturn the election. Certain minority groups promised to riot if Obama wasn’t elected. Can you imagine the anger and chaos if Obama’s election is overturned?

I don’t believe in coincidence here.
It is either to get rid of the NBC clause for once and for all.
Or it is to create a martial law situation. That would keep Bush in office.

A natural born citizen is anyone that is NOT a citizen of the United States as defined by the 14th Amendment.

Barack Obama = 14th Amendment citizen
Wong Kim Ark = 14th Amendment citizen
Arnold Schwarzenegger = 14th Amendment citizen

The 14h Amendment grants the same ‘level’ of citizenship to all three people, just under different circumstances. If Arnold can’t serve because he is ‘only’ a citizen of the United States, then neither can Barack Obama or Wong Kim Ark because they are ‘only’ citizens of the United States.

This same level of citizenship applies to them all.

(1) Children born to foreign diplomats
(2) Children born to enemy forces engaged in hostile occupation of the country’s territory
(3) Indians

Barack is admittedly a citizen of the United States under the 14th Amendment because he was born on US soil to one US citizen and one UK citizen.

Upon his BIRTH, he receives the same label (citizen of the United States) as Arnold Schwarzenegger received when he was naturalized in the United States.

It doesn’t matter if he WAS ’subject to the jurisdiction thereof’. He is STILL only a Citizen of the United States under the 14th Amendment.

Arnold is ’subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ via Naturalization
Barack is ’subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ via his Mother’s US citizenship.

Still doesn’t mean they can be President

Same would go for Wong Kim Ark. He was a Citizen of the United States by virtue of being BORN on US soil (regardless of parents allegiance).

14th Amendment:

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside…

Citizens of the United States under the 14h Amendment CANNOT be President. They can only be Senators or Representatives.

There are different ways to achieve the label of ‘Citizen of the United States)

1. Being BORN on US soil (Barack Obama)
2. Being Naturalized on US soil (Arnold Schwarzenegger)

Both are given the label ‘Citizen of the United States’ under the 14th Amendment. Arnold because he was naturalized and Barack because he was born on US soil (to ONE US citizen).

Neither can be President. They are the SAME type of citizen. A citizen of the United States.

If Barack could be President by MERELY being BORN on US soil (citizen of the United States) and Arnold has the SAME citizenship by being naturalized in the United States (citizen of the United States), why can one be eligible and not the other?

The answer is: NEITHER are eligible because they are ONLY citizens of the United States as recognized under the 14th Amendment.