JustiaGate: Tim Stanley Adds Disclaimer Regarding The Accuracy Of US Supreme Court Cases Published By Justia.
In a prior report, I suggested that Justia operatives were potentially facing prison sentences for multiple violations of the False Writings Statute, 18 U.S.C. 1018, since Justia’s versions of US Supreme Court cases contain a direct affirmation that one is viewing the “Full Text of Case”. Therefore, if Justia intentionally scrubbed information from these cases, the affirmation would be intentionally fraudulent.
Today, I was informed by Dan Goodman that Justia recently added a disclaimer to their versions of US Supreme Court cases. For example, go to Justia’s version of Minor v. Happersett and scroll to the bottom of the page, where it now states:
“Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.”
Justia continues to block all access to the Wayback Machine so that a full analysis of changes made to US Supreme Court cases previously published by Justia is impossible. Furthermore, Justia’s allegation that the scrubbing was due to an unintentional coding error has been scientifically debunked.
Leo Donofrio, Esq.
[See commenting rules here.]