[My previous report was in three parts, with the first being a rather extensive exposure of a misquote by the SCOTUS in both McCreery v. Somerville and Wong Kim Ark. The second part exposed fraudulent propaganda from Maskell’s most recent CRS memo. And the final part examined Minor v. Happersett in light of some of […]
Search Results
Minor v. Happersett Revisited.
January 9, 2012Permit Me A Diatribe.
December 14, 2011Let’s talk about the Constitution. This is a Document that provided the means by which justice could prevail. Before it was created, there was slavery. At first, the document allowed it to continue. But the men who drafted it were humbled by the faith citizens had put in them and the blood of brothers who […]
The Dred Scott Decision Is Evil, Racist, And Off Limits.
December 12, 2011I am preparing a comprehensive treatise on the natural-born citizen clause. And I want everyone to know my position as to the Dred Scott decision well before I publish. Scott v. Sandford is the most horrific piece of racist garbage our federal judicial system has ever doled out. My arguments will not rely upon that case […]
JustiaGate: Tim Stanley Adds Disclaimer Regarding The Accuracy Of US Supreme Court Cases Published By Justia.
December 8, 2011In a prior report, I suggested that Justia operatives were potentially facing prison sentences for multiple violations of the False Writings Statute, 18 U.S.C. 1018, since Justia’s versions of US Supreme Court cases contain a direct affirmation that one is viewing the “Full Text of Case”. Therefore, if Justia intentionally scrubbed information from these […]
JustiaGate: Keep Scrubbing, Stanley…You Missed a Few Spots.
November 2, 2011[UPDATED: Nov. 18, 2011 9:28 A.M. See new RULES for posting comments.] [UPDATED: Nov. 6, 2011 11:53 AM – See New RULES on posting comments.] Justia.com published corrupted versions of 25 US Supreme Court opinions pertaining to the issue of POTUS eligibility. (See previous JustiaGate reports here, here, here and here.) Admitting that many Supreme […]
JustiaGate: CEO Tim Stanley Admits Publishing “Mangled” Supreme Court Opinions – The Oyez Connection – SCOTUS Response.
October 31, 2011On Oct. 24, 2011, in an interview with CNET, Justia CEO Tim Stanley finally spoke publicly to address JustiaGate. This was four days after the release of my report concerning 25 US Supreme Court cases scrubbed by Justia at their “Supreme Court Center”. Stanley admitted that the cases identified in that report had, in fact, […]
Look Who Cited To Justia For Supreme Court Holding.
October 28, 2011[UPDATE: Sat. Oct 29, 2011, 8:46 AM – Cindy Simpson weighs in on JustiaGate, top story at American Thinker.] There’s a bogus astroturfing mantra going ’round the blogosphere which sounds something like this, “No real lawyer would ever use an online web site like Justia.” The talking point is thoroughly debunked by a very powerful […]
JustiaGate: CEO Tim Stanley Claims Innocence After Blocking Access To Wayback Machine Snapshots Of All Supreme Court Cases Published By Justia.
October 26, 2011Yesterday, in a stunning development, Justia CEO Tim Stanley blocked Wayback Machine access to all US Supreme Court cases published by Justia.com. This is the epitome – the textbook definition even – of hypocrisy. As Dianna Cotter previously reported: “Justia founder Tim Stanley has for years prided himself and his companies on principles of ‘freedom […]
JUSTIA.COM SURGICALLY REMOVED “MINOR v HAPPERSETT” FROM 25 SUPREME COURT OPINIONS IN RUN UP TO ’08 ELECTION.
October 20, 2011[UPDATE #3 8:54 AM Oct. 24, 200 – Justia.com has suddenly placed robots over their entire site. So much for Justia’s mission, “To advance the availability of legal resources for the benefit of society.” Here is a link to the Wayback Machine’s URL search of Roe v Wade, a case which has nothing to do […]
JUSTIA.COM CAUGHT RED HANDED HIDING REFERENCES TO MINOR v. HAPPERSETT IN PUBLISHED US SUPREME COURT OPINIONS.
July 1, 2011The US Supreme Court Center at Justia.com is the leading resource on the internet which publishes United States Supreme Court decisions. They have been caught red handed in an Orwellian attempt to revise US Supreme Court cases which mention Minor v. Happersett as precedent on the issue of citizenship, as opposed to the other […]
